Ontvang nu dagelijks onze kooptips!

word abonnee
Van beleggers
voor beleggers
desktop iconMarkt Monitor
  • Word abonnee
  • Inloggen

    • Geen account? Registreren

    Wachtwoord vergeten?

Koffiekamer« Terug naar discussie overzicht

Amerika, de ondergang van een empire.

936 Posts
Pagina: «« 1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 ... 47 »» | Laatste | Omlaag ↓
  1. [verwijderd] 11 april 2015 13:41
    Cops Kill Another Unarmed Man, Gunned Down at his Place of Work Over Unpaid Traffic Fines
    thefreethoughtproject.com/life-hashta...

    Betalen aan de roverheid of ze schieten je dood.

    After cops executed him, the media went on a campaign of character assassination, blaming the victim. They didn't mention that the cop who executed this young man was fired from a previous department for beating his wife.
  2. [verwijderd] 11 april 2015 16:45
    quote:

    pcrs7 schreef op 11 april 2015 16:06:

    Shocking dashcam video shows fatal shooting of mentally ill Florida man
    rt.com/usa/248469-florida-shooting-me...
    Inderdaad schokkend. Politieagent voelde zich bedreigd, zegt hij. Jaja, maar zo ziet het er niet uit. Het is juist het zieke slachtoffer wat werd bedreigd.
    Mijn indruk is dat agentj vond dat hij niet snel genoeg gehoorzaamd werd. Wat verwacht je eigenlijk van een mentaal zieke?
    Geen reden om zo iemand dood te schieten.
    Dat het slachtoffer 'mentally ill' was wist de lokale politie.
    Hebben die agenten daar geen training voor gehad om daar mee om te gaan?

    Een vakman probeert te deëscaleren. Deze agent doet exact het tegenovergestelde. Roept en schreeuwt. En schiet niet als waarschuwing, of op de benen. Nee, hij schiet DOOD.

    Wat een ongelooflijke lafferik. Dit heeft NIETS te maken met 'je bedreigd voelen'.
  3. [verwijderd] 11 april 2015 16:59
    Standaard verdediging bowski: ik voelde mij bedreigd.
    De standaard verdediging die iedere geweldenaar aanvoert. Het is natuurlijk gewoon de projectie op een ander van het geweld dat in hen zelf zit.
    Geweldenaars zien altijd bedreigingen in de verte.

    countercurrentnews.com/2015/03/audito...
    Audio Released of Cop Shooting and Killing College Student for Speaking Disrespectfully
  4. forum rang 6 pietje-2005 12 april 2015 07:11
    Die zogenaamde Nobelprijswinnaar voor Chantage, Spionage en Regime-Change heeft een historische ontmoeting gehad, haha.
    Rutte zal het ook wel erg "speciaal" gevonden hebben, die door geld afgedwongen hand voor de mindere.
    Nu willen ze net laten lijken alsof hij er toch toe gedaan heeft, haha.
    En hij, van WC-eend, zegt alvast dat WC-eend in de vorm van een oude taart die niet vies is van hetzelfde, heel goed is.
    Goed voor de sigaren-handel van Cuba ;-)
  5. [verwijderd] 15 april 2015 09:11
    Vlag van 1000 meter in Venezuela. Maar geen toiletpapier in de winkel.
    socialisme. Altijd hetzelfde resultaat, zo ook in de VS.
    www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-04-14/cha...

    Yet, ensuring that the global oil trade will be carried out in dollars for decades to come requires a Middle East controlled by the U.S. as complete as possible. This can be done through regime changes wherever necessary in order to nip possible anti-dollar alliances in the bud. In this vein, the neoconservative Project for the New American Century (PNAC) was from the very start targeted towards such a direction, with its willingness to create a ‘Greater Middle East’ that ought to be subordinated to the U.S. to the greatest possible extent. In PNAC documents there is no mention of creating conditions for peace but instead for wars, for expanding military bases all around the world, for military superiority on land, in water and in the air, for nuclear defense shields in the earth’s atmosphere, and above all for further increases in defense spending.

    Over the last decade, the U.S. with its annual defense budget of $500 billion to $800 billion has spent as much on armaments as the rest of the world combined. Any other national economy would have collapsed long ago under such tremendous unproductive spending. Indeed, the arms race during the Cold War did lead to the demise of the Soviet Union. In contrast, after the end of the bloc confrontation U.S. arms spending rose exponentially from $150 billion in 1990 to the astronomic sum of $739 billion in 2011. The share of military expenditure as a proportion of GDP is currently 4% in the U.S., more than twice that of other Western industrialized nations. The opposition, otherwise loudly opposing administration policies of increasing other budget items, refrains from criticizing military spending as a matter of principle, the exception being when an increase in military spending is deemed too low. Nor is this massive military spending subject to any substantial debate in the media or in society at large. But how can these enormous arms expenditures be explained and how are they justified to the people? Ultimately, this is done by the fact that the U.S. also covers its military spending by government debt and printing money. Instead, financing the costs of war via direct taxes would mobilize people against any war. Both World Wars were financed by public debt, not only by European but also all U.S. administrations. Through the continuity of wars, especially since the First World War, the U.S. public debt has continued to grow.

    The de facto monopoly over world money explains how a national economy like that of the U.S., which in many areas is simply not competitive and shows chronic trade balance deficits, can finance not only such mega-projects as the military-industrial complex and various quite expensive wars, but also has a relatively stable financial sector and a currency that attracts magnet-like surplus capital from all over the world.

    A world without order and chaos as opportunity – for the U.S.

    To maintain its hegemony, the U.S. must by all means prevent the emergence of rival powers and impede possible current as well as future threats that could emanate from oil states. The ideal condition for enforcing its own goals at a low cost would be the fragmentation of antagonistic power centers through ethnic and religious strife, civil wars, chaos and deep-seated mistrust in the Middle East – always following the well-known premise of ‘divide and rule.’ In this way, for decades to come no other power would be able to even consider trading oil in a currency other than dollars. In addition, as all the opponents need petrodollars to purchase weapons, the oil wells gush merrily on – as they currently do in Iraq despite daily acts of terror and chaos paralyzing the country.

    In fact, we are currently experiencing tremendous changes towards such a chaotic state of affairs. Meanwhile, there have been regime changes in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya. In all these countries, discord and distrust, tribal conflicts, territorial separations among ethnic lines and mutual terror have been raging – particularly from Sunnis against Shi’ites. However, the regime change project has not ended here. Now, Syria and Iran have been put in crosshairs: U.S. neo-cons have spared no efforts to torpedo the nuclear negotiations with Iran. And Al-Qaeda – officially the main reason for the U.S. ‘war on terror’ – has in the meanwhile attained unprecedented strength. This prowess provides, in turn, the best basis of legitimacy for the U.S. military-industrial complex.

    The old military-industrial complex

    This way all the strands of ‘dollar imperialism’ come together: oil, dollars, and the military. The military-industrial complex is the main beneficiary of the ‘new American century’ of New Wars.
  6. [verwijderd] 15 april 2015 17:08
    Wow, what een speech van Morales:

    Boliviens Präsident zu Obama: Hören Sie auf, die Welt in ein Schlachtfeld zu verwandeln!

    Deutsche Wirtschafts Nachrichten | Veröffentlicht: 15.04.15 10:57 Uhr | 36 Kommentare

    Der bolivianische Präsident Morales hat beim Gipfel der lateinamerikanischen Staaten in Panama die US-Regierung scharf attackiert. Er warf Washington vor, die Welt zu destabilisieren, die Souveränität anderer Nationen nicht zu achten, und sich mit imperialistischer Attitüde gegen andere Staaten auf der Welt zu verhalten. Die USA müssten Kuba nicht „helfen“, sondern sollten für den Schaden bezahlen, den sie in Kuba angerichtet haben.

    deutsche-wirtschafts-nachrichten.de/2...
  7. [verwijderd] 16 april 2015 08:17
    De 2008 crisis kwam door de regulering gaat het verhaal. Nu even de werkelijkheid ipv propaganda. Want met zo'n diagnose zou je haast om meer regulering gaan vragen

    On March 16, 1936, the government of the United States published the very first edition of the Federal Register.

    President Roosevelt had been taking a lot of heat over the previous year; under his New Deal program, dozens of government agencies were passing new rules, regulations, and codes at an absolutely feverish pace.

    It became impossible for anyone to keep track of them—even the other agencies within the government.

    So in the summer of 1935 they created a new law requiring every executive agency to publish a daily, official record of their activities.

    This official record was called the Federal Register. And it would contain a complete set of every rule, regulation, code, and proposal issued by each of the executive agencies.

    The first edition was published on March 16, 1936. It was sixteen pages.

    Every single work day since then, without fail, the government has published the Federal Register.

    Its first full year (1937) contained a total of 3,450 pages. By 1942, the Federal Register had grown to over 10,000 pages.

    It passed 20,000 for the first time in 1967. More than 30,000 in 1973. And more than 40,000 the following year in 1974.

    The Federal Register exploded during the 1970s, in fact, touching nearly 90,000 pages by the end of the Carter administration.

    During Reagan’s time, the publication shrank to under 50,000, only to rise again under subsequent presidents.

    The longest edition ever published was logged at 6,653 pages in a single day, during the administration of Bush II.

    President Obama has averaged nearly 80,000 pages per year, far and away the highest of any President in US history.

    This morning’s edition, in fact, is a whopping 358 pages full of new rules, regulations, and proposals.

    Did you read it? Neither did I. But as the old saying goes, ignorance of the law is not an excuse.

    Federal-Register-chart

    This is absurd. Every single one of those regulations makes people less free.

    They criminalize the most innocent behavior and make it impossible for the average person to know what’s legal and what’s not as if we all have some some civic duty to read and memorize 80,000 pages per year of government regulation.

    4,500 criminal statutes now exist under US Code. That’s 1,500 times more than the three crimes outlined in the Constitution– piracy, treason, and counterfeiting.

    (Ironically, the Federal Reserve and commercial banks commit the latter on a daily basis…)

    We’ve seen this theme countless times throughout history.

    Under Diocletian’s reign, the Roman Empire’s body of laws and regulations multiplied like rabbits.
    www.sovereignman.com/trends/proof-tha...
936 Posts
Pagina: «« 1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 ... 47 »» | Laatste |Omhoog ↑

Meedoen aan de discussie?

Word nu gratis lid of log in met je emailadres en wachtwoord.