Ontvang nu dagelijks onze kooptips!

word abonnee
IEX 25 jaar desktop iconMarkt Monitor

Koffiekamer« Terug naar discussie overzicht

Ripple - XRP - nieuwe verdienmodellen noodzakelijk voor bancaire sector

3.265 Posts
Pagina: «« 1 ... 153 154 155 156 157 ... 164 »» | Laatste | Omlaag ↓
  1. Gemberthee 1 september 2021 19:31
    quote:

    Frederik C. schreef op 31 augustus 2021 22:55:

    twitter.com/cryptolawus/status/143275...

    Welp

    The SEC is going to have to disclose the documents Ripple has requested be released to Judge Netburn.

    September 14th submittal to the court.

    twitter.com/cryptolawus/status/143275...
    Het ziet er goed uit é.
    Tegen december/januari noteren we rond de 5 dollar denk ik.
    Blij dat ik ze terug heb mijn XRPtjes .
  2. Frederik C. 1 september 2021 22:13
    quote:

    Joshua41 schreef op 1 september 2021 19:31:

    [...]

    Het ziet er goed uit é.
    Tegen december/januari noteren we rond de 5 dollar denk ik.
    Blij dat ik ze terug heb mijn XRPtjes .
    Slim...Doe je goed!

    Ripple corners SEC with motion on Howie Test
    financefeeds.com/ripple-corners-sec-w...

    SEC v. Ripple: Judge aware of XRP Army’s investigative work – Atty Hogan
    financefeeds.com/sec-v-ripple-judge-a...
  3. Ldb286 7 september 2021 12:10
    goede morgen ..ik heb KIN CRIPTO OP FTX nu wil ik deel van mijn geld daar weg halen ,maar zou graag iemand willen die het weet hoe je het naar je rekening kan halen (storten of opnemen? ) is erg moeilijk of lijkt dat maar zo ,graag iemand aub ,,of eventueel via telfoon of zo ,bij voorbaat dank
  4. forum rang 10 DeZwarteRidder 7 september 2021 12:33
    quote:

    Ldb286 schreef op 7 september 2021 12:10:

    goede morgen ..ik heb KIN CRIPTO OP FTX nu wil ik deel van mijn geld daar weg halen ,maar zou graag iemand willen die het weet hoe je het naar je rekening kan halen (storten of opnemen? ) is erg moeilijk of lijkt dat maar zo ,graag iemand aub ,,of eventueel via telfoon of zo ,bij voorbaat dank
    Je kan je geld terughalen op dezelfde manier als dat het daar gekomen is en als dat niet mogelijk is zijn het waarschijnlijk oplichters.

    Ik heb trouwens nog nooit gehoord van 'KIN of FTX'.
  5. forum rang 10 DeZwarteRidder 7 september 2021 13:00
    quote:

    Ldb286 schreef op 7 september 2021 12:10:

    goede morgen ..ik heb KIN CRIPTO OP FTX nu wil ik deel van mijn geld daar weg halen ,maar zou graag iemand willen die het weet hoe je het naar je rekening kan halen (storten of opnemen? ) is erg moeilijk of lijkt dat maar zo ,graag iemand aub ,,of eventueel via telfoon of zo ,bij voorbaat dank
    Depositing and Withdrawing

    To deposit or withdraw fiat, go to ftx.com/wallet and click 'deposit' under 'USD', 'AUD', 'EUR', 'GBP', 'HKD', 'SGD', 'CAD', 'CHF' or whatever fiat currency you'd like to deposit. You'll get all the instructions. If you are required by the instructions to use a memo, you must use the memo or your account will not be credited.

    Deposit summary

    We do not charge fees on deposits.
    Your bank account name must match your FTX name.
    You must initiate the deposit on your account.
    We recommend that you read this whole document.
    Deposits should not be made directly to any intermediary bank.

    Withdrawal summary

    We only charge a $75 USD fee on USD withdrawals under $10,000 and BRL has 0.3% + R$10 withdrawal fee. There are no other fees on any other currency.
    Your bank account name must match your FTX name.
    We recommend that you read this whole document.
  6. Ldb286 7 september 2021 17:26
    dank u wel ,,waar kan ik het dan naar toe storten ,geen rabo of zo neem ik aan ,,binance of zo??
    weet je wat het is ben 68 jaar en iemand heeft kin voor mij gekocht ,,maar nu zie ik die pers niet meer dus zou ik hulp van iemand willen .
    woon in rotterdam ommoord ,,misschien in de buurt van u ??
  7. forum rang 10 DeZwarteRidder 7 september 2021 19:10
    quote:

    Ldb286 schreef op 7 september 2021 17:26:

    dank u wel ,,waar kan ik het dan naar toe storten ,geen rabo of zo neem ik aan ,,binance of zo??
    weet je wat het is ben 68 jaar en iemand heeft kin voor mij gekocht ,,maar nu zie ik die pers niet meer dus zou ik hulp van iemand willen .
    woon in rotterdam ommoord ,,misschien in de buurt van u ??
    Hoe heb jij die persoon betaald en waarom zie je hem niet meer?

    Heb je een account bij FTX, waar je kunt inloggen met een eigen wachtwoord?
  8. forum rang 10 DeZwarteRidder 7 september 2021 20:18
    quote:

    Ldb286 schreef op 7 september 2021 17:26:

    dank u wel ,,waar kan ik het dan naar toe storten ,geen rabo of zo neem ik aan ,,binance of zo??
    weet je wat het is ben 68 jaar en iemand heeft kin voor mij gekocht ,,maar nu zie ik die pers niet meer dus zou ik hulp van iemand willen .
    woon in rotterdam ommoord ,,misschien in de buurt van u ??
    Ik heb slecht nieuws voor je: de KIN is vrijwel niks meer waard en kan op geen enkele grote cryptobeurs verhandeld worden.

    FTX is de verreweg de grootste.

    Het stinkt allemaal naar rotte vis.
  9. Frederik C. 29 september 2021 13:44
    Latest filing by Ripple... Vol in de aanval!

    Perhaps the most explosive revelation of the SEC’s privilege log is that the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance—a Division that operates distinctly from the Division of Enforcement—wrote a memorandumcontaining a “legal analysis of XRP.” That memorandum was then circulated to certain individuals at theSEC on the day beforeformer Director of Corporation Finance Bill Hinman gave a speech publicly declaring Ether not to be a security.5ECF No. 255-3.The SEC’s privilege log asserts that this document is attorney work productand subject to the DPP, and it asserts for the first time in this letterthat it is also subject to attorney-client privilege. The SEC isincorrect as to all three privilege claims. Thisdocument is not work product. First, if this document were part of the SEC’s investigative file, as the SEC now seems to assert, it presumably would have been covered by the SEC’s categorical privilege log,(see ECF No. 289-3), and no further logging would have been necessary. The very logging of this documentsuggests that it was not part of the investigative file andraises questions about what it is and why it was prepared. Second, the SECdoes not tell us who authored the document and when. All we know is that it predates June 13, 2018, and that it was sentby the Office of the Chief Counselof the Division of Corporate Finance. Third, the SEC does not assert that the memorandum was drafted at the direction of Enforcement counsel in view of litigation, only that it was sentto a single enforcement counsel—along with nine other people who are not in the Division of Enforcement. ECF No. 289-6 at 3. There is every reason to believe that the Division of Corporation Finance was looking at XRP’s status under the securities laws independently of considering whether the Division of Enforcement might recommend an action to the Commission.Further, documents produced by the SEC showthat yet another Division—the Division of Investment Management—wasassessing facts in relation to Bitcoin, Ether and XRP around this same time.SeeAppendix A, Entry 6. Fourth, the Enforcement Division did not open a formal investigationinto Ripple until March2019, months after this Corporation Finance memorandum was circulated,and did not file this action until a year and a half after that.6Finally, although the SEC asserts that “Enforcement staff worked closely with Corporation Finance staff in connection withthe Ripple investigation,” reliance by the Enforcement Division on expertise from Corporation Finance would not transform all of the latter’s documents into pre-litigation attorney work productif they were not prepared for that purpose. Indeed, the SEC’s own internal notes reflect that little more than a month after this memorandum was circulated in June 2018, Ripple’s CEO Brad Garlinghouse and others met with the Chairman of the SEC(Jay Clayton) and Director of Corporation Finance(Mr. Hinman), and that following those discussions the SEC’s own note-taker recounted that Chairman Clayton “encourage[ed] the Ripple executives to continue its ongoing discussions with the staff of the Division of Corporation Finance”—with no mention of any ongoing enforcement matter.7See ECF No. 289-8. As for the SEC’s assertion that Entry 2does not “support[] Defendants’ proffered defense,” (ECF No. 351 at 1), the SEC’s self-serving view on that question doesnotdefine the scope of discovery—relevance does. This memorandum is plainlyrelevant.The SEC’s assertions of DPP and attorney-client privilege over this document suffer from the same overarching flaws described above. As to attorney-client privilege—a claim that the SEC makes for the first time in its brief—the SEC fails to identify who the clientis, who the attorneyisandwhether any information reflected in this memorandum was confidential and intended to be kept confidential with respect to the agency itself. Notevery document prepared in the course of a lawyer’s job responsibilities isprotected by attorney-client privilege. With respect to the DPP, the SEC again fails to establish that this document was part of a policy process or was intendedto assist the agency decisionmakers in arriving ata decision. In fact, that the SEC “did not present any recommendation to the Commission” suggestingthe opposite is true. ECF No. 351 at 11. Thus, the SEC’s attempts to claim all three privileges over this document fail.

    5See Yahoo FinancePresents All Markets Summit: Crypto, Yahoo Finance (June 14, 2018) finance.yahoo.com/news/yahoo-finance-... noted above, the SEC’s simultaneous suggestions that the legal status of XRP is a “straightforward” application of a settled, decades-old legal test, but also that it somehow took the SEC two and a half years of further investigation and deliberation after conducting the analysis in Entry 2 before it decided to bring this enforcement action, only underscore the highly relevantand potentially exculpatory nature of this memorandum.
    www.dropbox.com/s/vde8gm2z07rxxdm/Rev...
  10. Frederik C. 5 oktober 2021 00:26
    This is a big blow to the SEC and a huge win for the XRP community now that we finally have a seat at the table” @JohnEDeaton1 tells me in response to a SDNY judge granting him permission to intervene in the Ripple vs. SEC lawsuit on behalf of more than 23,000 #XRP investors.

    Look at this from Judge Torres' Order granting Amicus status to XRP Holders.

    Yes, Judge, a lot of things about this case are backwards. Why would 22k XRP "securities" holders want to intervene as DEFENDANTS in a case where the SEC is supposed to be representing them??
    Image

    twitter.com/attorneyjeremy1/status/14...
  11. Frederik C. 5 oktober 2021 01:02
    quote:

    Frederik C. schreef op 5 oktober 2021 00:26:

    This is a big blow to the SEC and a huge win for the XRP community now that we finally have a seat at the table” @JohnEDeaton1 tells me in response to a SDNY judge granting him permission to intervene in the Ripple vs. SEC lawsuit on behalf of more than 23,000 #XRP investors.

    Look at this from Judge Torres' Order granting Amicus status to XRP Holders.

    Yes, Judge, a lot of things about this case are backwards. Why would 22k XRP "securities" holders want to intervene as DEFENDANTS in a case where the SEC is supposed to be representing them??
    Image

    twitter.com/attorneyjeremy1/status/14...
    REUTERS:
    Judge in Ripple cryptocurrency case wants token holders' views

    The XRP tokenholders sought to intervene in March, saying they were de facto defendants in the case and wanted to protect their interests.

    John Deaton of the Deaton Law Firm, who represents the XRP holders, and a spokesperson for the SEC did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Monday.

    "We were all granted amicus status today!" Deaton wrote on Twitter, where the ruling was celebrated by cryptocurrency enthusiasts.

    www.reuters.com/legal/transactional/j...
  12. Frederik C. 10 oktober 2021 21:15
    Prijs gaat langzaam hoger...$1,2....

    BREAKING: 1/3 Judge Netburn Orders the SEC to submit for in camera review the two documents related to the SEC's meetings with law firms and the email chain concerning discussions with a third party who received guidance from the SEC to analyze its digital asset under the framework set forth in Hinman’s June 14, 2018 speech. The SEC must also submit an explanation for its privilege assertions for all of those documents no later than October 15, 2021.


    twitter.com/FilanLaw/status/144645573...
3.265 Posts
Pagina: «« 1 ... 153 154 155 156 157 ... 164 »» | Laatste |Omhoog ↑

Meedoen aan de discussie?

Word nu gratis lid of log in met je emailadres en wachtwoord.