Ontvang nu dagelijks onze kooptips!

word abonnee
IEX 25 jaar
Uitgebreid zoeken

Beurscodes, betekenis en hulp bij zoeken

Europa

AEX
Euronext Amsterdam
BRU
Euronext Brussels
PSE
Euronext Paris
LIS
Euronext Lissabon
CHX
CBOE Europe, grote(re) EU aandelen
NAV
Investment Funds (NAV)

Noord-Amerika

NYS
New York Stock Exchange
OTC
CBOE BZX Exchange (US)
TSE
Toronto Stock Exchange

Kunt u een instrument niet vinden?

Zoek dan via de zogenaamde ISIN code. Elk instrument, aandeel etc. heeft een unieke code.

Kies vervolgens - wanneer er meerdere resultaten zijn - de notering op de beurs van uw keuze.

Waar vind ik die ISIN code?

Google de naam van het instrument, aandeel etc. met de toevoeging 'ISIN'.

Als zoeken op ISIN code geen resultaten oplevert hebben wij het instrument of aandeel niet in onze koersendatabase.

desktop iconMarkt Monitor
Markt vandaag Koersen Forum Premium IEX Expert
Home  /   Forum   /   Plug Power   /   Forum Plug Power Inc geopend

Aandeel Plug Power OTC:PLUG.Q, US72919P2020

Vertraagde koers (usd) Verschil Volume
2,380   -0,040   (-1,65%) Dagrange 2,330 - 2,430 53.838.814   Gem. (3M) 55,9M

Forum Plug Power Inc geopend

Volgen
4.626 Posts
Pagina: «« 1 ... 144 145 146 147 148 ... 232 »» | Laatste | Omlaag ↓
  1. forum rang 10 DeZwarteRidder 6 augustus 2021 10:56
    quote:

    Belegopjeboterham schreef op 6 augustus 2021 10:37:

    [...]Onder de streep bleef nog altijd een verlies van bijna 100 miljoen dollar over, tegenover ruim 160 miljoen dollar negatief in dezelfde periode een jaar eerder.

    In het kwartaal verkocht PlugPower 3.666 brandstofcelsystemen en behaalde het omzet uit 16 hydrogene infrastructuursystemen. Dat aantal lag een jaar eerder op respectievelijk 2.683 en 4 stuks.

    Plug Power rekent voor de tweede jaarhelft op een verbetering van de marges.
    We weten dat ze waarschijnlijk in 2024 winst gaan maken. Maar dat er 1000 brandstofcel systemen en 12 ja ja 12 infrastructuusystemen meer verkocht zijn is toch een mooi resultaat!!.
    Die vermeende winst in 2024 gaat er natuurlijk niet komen; dat wordt alleen gezegd om de aandeelhouders koest te houden.
  2. forum rang 4 StartendeBelegger 6 augustus 2021 11:50
    quote:

    DeZwarteRidder schreef op 6 augustus 2021 10:56:

    [...]

    Die vermeende winst in 2024 gaat er natuurlijk niet komen; dat wordt alleen gezegd om de aandeelhouders koest te houden.
    Plug zou toch bij elke verkochte brandstofcel meer verlies maken? Dit blijkt al een loze bewering. Dus dit zal ook wel niet waar zijn.
  3. forum rang 10 DeZwarteRidder 6 augustus 2021 12:59
    PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
    Item 1 — Legal Proceedings
    On August 28, 2018, a lawsuit was filed on behalf of multiple individuals against the Company and five corporate co-
    defendants in the 9th Judicial District Court, Rapides Parish, Louisiana. The lawsuit relates to the previously disclosed May 2018
    accident involving a forklift powered by the Company’s fuel cell at a Procter & Gamble facility in Louisiana. The lawsuit alleges
    claims against the Company and co-defendants, including Structural Composites Industries, Deep South Equipment Co., Air
    Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Hyster-Yale Group, Inc. for claims under the Louisiana Product Liability Act (“LPLA”)
    including defect in construction and/or composition, design defect, inadequate warning, breach of express warranty and
    negligence for wrongful death and personal injuries, among other damages. Procter & Gamble has intervened in that suit to
    recover worker’s compensation benefits paid to or for the employees/dependents. Procter & Gamble has also filed suit for
    property damage, business interruption, loss of revenue, expenses, and other damages. Procter & Gamble alleges theories under
    the LPLA, breach of warranty and quasi-contractual claims under Louisiana law. Defendants include the Company and several of
    the same co-defendants from the August 2018 lawsuit, including Structural Composites Industries, Deep South Equipment Co.,
    and Hyster-Yale Group, Inc.
    In March and May 2021, Company stockholders, individually and on behalf of all persons who purchased or otherwise
    acquired Plug securities between November 9, 2020 and March 16, 2021 (the “Class”), filed complaints in the U.S. District Court
    for the Southern District of New York and U.S. District Court for the Central District of California against the Company, Plug
    Chief Executive Officer Andrew Marsh, and Plug Chief Financial Officer Paul Middleton (together, the “Defendants”), captioned
    Dawn Beverly et al. v. Plug Power Inc. et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-02004 (S.D.N.Y.), Smolícek v. Plug Power Inc. et al., Case No.
    2:21-cv-02402 (C.D. Cal.) and Tank v. Plug Power Inc. et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-03985 (S.D.N.Y.). The complaints include two
    claims, for (1) violation of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b5 promulgated thereunder (against all Defendants);
    and (2) violation of Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act (against Mr. Marsh and Mr. Middleton). The complaints allege that
    Defendants failed to disclose that the Company (i) “would be unable to timely file its 2020 annual report due to delays related to
    the review of classification of certain costs and the recoverability of the right to use assets with certain leases”; and (ii) “was
    reasonably likely to report material weaknesses
    Table of Contents
    57
    in its internal control over financial reporting[.]” The complaints allege that, a result, “positive statements about the Company’s
    business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis,” causing Class members losses
    and damages. The complaints seek compensatory damages “in an amount to be proven at trial, including interest thereon”;
    “reasonable costs and expenses incurred in th[e] action”; and “[s]uch other and further relief as the [c]ourt may deem just and
    proper.” On July 22, 2021, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York consolidated the three cases and
    appointed a lead plaintiff. On July 28, 2021, Tank v. Plug Power, et. al., was voluntarily dismissed.

  4. forum rang 10 DeZwarteRidder 6 augustus 2021 13:00

    On March 31, 2021, Company stockholder Junwei Liu, derivatively and on behalf of nominal defendant Plug, filed a
    complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against certain Company directors and officers (the
    “Derivative Defendants”), captioned Liu v. Marsh et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-02753 (S.D.N.Y.) (the “Liu Derivative Complaint”).
    The Liu Derivative Complaint alleges that, between November 9, 2020 and March 1, 2021, the Derivative Defendants “made, or
    caused the Company to make, materially false and misleading statements concerning Plug Power’s business, operations, and
    prospects” by “issu[ing] positive financial information and optimistic guidance, and made assurances that the Company’s internal
    controls were effective,” when, “[i]n reality, the Company’s internal controls suffered from material deficiencies that rendered
    them ineffective.” The Liu Derivative Complaint asserts claims for (1) breach of fiduciary duties, (2) unjust enrichment, (3) abuse
    of control, (4) gross mismanagement, (5) waste of corporate assets, and (6) contribution under Sections 10(b) and 21D of the
    Exchange Act (as to the named officer defendants). The Liu Derivative Complaint seeks a judgment “[d]eclaring that Plaintiff
    may maintain this action on behalf of Plug”; “[d]eclaring that the [Derivative] Defendants have breached and/or aided and
    abetted the breach of their fiduciary duties”; “awarding to Plug Power the damages sustained by it as a result of the violations”
    set forth in the Liu Derivative Complaint, “together with pre-judgment and post-judgment interest thereon”; “[d]irecting Plug
    Power and the [Derivative] Defendants to take all necessary actions to reform and improve Plug Power’s corporate governance
    and internal procedures to comply with applicable laws”; and “[a]warding Plaintiff the costs and disbursements of this action,
    including reasonable attorneys’ and experts’ fees, costs, and expenses”; and “[s]uch other and further relief as the [c]ourt may
    deem just and proper.”

  5. forum rang 10 DeZwarteRidder 6 augustus 2021 13:00
    On April 5, 2021, Company stockholders Elias Levy and Camerohn X. Withers, derivatively and on behalf of nominal
    defendant Plug, filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against the Derivative
    Defendants named in the Liu Derivative Complaint, captioned Levy et al. v. McNamee et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-02891 (S.D.N.Y.)
    (the “Levy Derivative Complaint”). The Levy Derivative Complaint alleges that, from November 9, 2020 to April 5, 2021, the
    Derivative Defendants “breached their duties of loyalty and good faith” by failing to disclose “(1) that the Company would be
    unable to timely file its 2020 annual report due to delays related to the review of classification of certain costs and the
    recoverability of the right to use assets with certain leases; (2) that the Company was reasonably likely to report material
    weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting; and (3) that, as a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ positive
    statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable
    basis.” The Levy Derivative Complaint asserts claims for (1) breach of fiduciary duty (as to the named director defendants), (2)
    unjust enrichment (as to certain named director defendants), (3) waste of corporate assets (as to the named director defendants),
    and (4) violations of Sections 10(b) and 21D of the Exchange Act (as to the named officer defendants). The Levy Derivative
    Complaint seeks a judgment “declaring that Plaintiffs may maintain this action on behalf of the Company”; finding the
    Derivative Defendants “liable for breaching their fiduciary duties owed to the Company”; directing the Derivative Defendants “to
    take all necessary actions to reform and improve the Company’s corporate governance, risk management, and internal operating
    procedures to comply with applicable laws”; “awarding damages to the Company for the harm the Company suffered as a result
    of Defendants’ wrongful conduct”; “awarding damages to the Company for [the named officer Derivative Defendants’] violations
    of Sections 10(b) and 21D of the Exchange Act”; “awarding Plaintiffs the costs and disbursements of this action, including
    attorneys’, accountants’, and experts’ fees”; and “awarding such other and further relief as is just and equitable.” On April 27,

    2021, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York consolidated the Liu Derivative Complaint and the Levy
    Derivative Complaint under Case No. 1:21-cv-02753-ER (the “Consolidated Action”).
    On May 13, 2021, Company stockholder Romario St. Clair, derivatively and on behalf of nominal defendant Plug, filed
    a complaint in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York against the Derivative Defendants named in
    the Liu Derivative Complaint, captioned St. Clair v. Plug Power Inc. et al., Index No. 653167/2021 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., N.Y. Cty.)
    (the “St. Clair Derivative Complaint”). The St. Clair Derivative Complaint alleges that, for
    Table of Contents
    58
    approximately two years beginning on March 13, 2019, the Company “failed to disclose and misrepresented the following
    material, adverse facts, which the [Derivative] Defendants knew, consciously disregarded, or were reckless in not knowing,”
    including: “(a) that the Company was experiencing known but undisclosed material weaknesses in its internal controls over
    financial reporting; (b) the Company was overstating the carrying amount of certain right of use assets and finance obligations
    associated with leases; (c) the Company was understating its loss accrual on certain service contracts; (d) the Company would
    need to take impairment charges relating to certain long-lived assets; (e) the Company was improperly classifying research [and]
    development costs versus costs of goods sold; and (f) the Company would be unable to file its Annual Report for the 2020 fiscal
    year due to these errors.” The St. Clair Derivative Complaint asserts claims for (1) breach of fiduciary and (2) unjust
    enrichment. The St. Clair Derivative Complaint seeks a judgment “for the amount of damages sustained by the Company” as a
    result of the Derivative Defendants’ breaches of fiduciary duties and unjust enrichment; “[d]irecting Plug Power to take all
    necessary actions to reform and improve its corporate governance and internal procedures to comply with applicable laws”; for
    “equitable and/or injunctive relief as permitted by law, equity, and state statutory provisions”; “awarding to Plug Power
    restitution” and “ordering disgorgement of all profits, benefits, and other compensation obtained” by the Derivative Defendants;
    “awarding to plaintiff the costs and disbursements of the action, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, accountants’ and experts’
    fees, costs, and expenses”; and “granting such other and further relief as the [c]ourt deems just and proper.”
    Item 1A – Risk Factors
    The risk factors discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in the Company’s Annual Report on
    Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 continue to apply to our business.
  9. forum rang 4 StartendeBelegger 6 augustus 2021 14:20
    quote:

    StartendeBelegger schreef op 6 augustus 2021 11:50:

    [...]

    Plug zou toch bij elke verkochte brandstofcel meer verlies maken? Dit blijkt al een loze bewering. Dus dit zal ook wel niet waar zijn.
    DZR, je hebt deze post denk gemist, maar is hier een verklaring voor?
  13. [verwijderd] 6 augustus 2021 16:03
    quote:

    StartendeBelegger schreef op 6 augustus 2021 14:31:

    [...]

    Ja precies, hou dan op met onzin te verkondigen als je jezelf niet eens kan verdedigen.
    Gewoon niet meer op reageren, dan stopt hij ooit vanzelf.

    Mooie cijfers van plug, krijg weer beetje meer vertrouwen er in na het gedoe met uitgestelde q1 en al die bullshit.
  14. forum rang 6 suskewiet 6 augustus 2021 19:19
    believers en not believers.
    Logica is een beetje zoek .
    Verlies boeken en toch in de toekomst geloven ;
    Het risico is dat als ge nu uw aandeel verkoopt en nadien spijt van gaat hebben .
    Ik wil zeggen dat je twee jaar met het aandeel in wachtstand zit .
    Ik heb de keuze gemaakt en blijf het gewoon behouden .
    Hopen dat de leiding goede bedoelingen heeft .
    De toekomst is en blijft waterstof .
    Ook geen dividend .
    Heb het gekocht rond de 32 dollar en hopelijk zie ik mijn geld terug ,maar zal geduld moeten hebben .
  17. Katsjinggg 8 augustus 2021 15:54
    quote:

    DeZwarteRidder schreef op 6 augustus 2021 19:22:

    Dit aandeel gaat ongetwijfeld nog veel verder zakken, dus blijf vooral lekker zitten.
    even ter duiding ....Amazon was jaaaaren niet winstgevend, en kende veel dips (zelfs tot meer dan - 80%) ....nog steeds is de het deel van de firma dat toen de core was een zorgenkindje...

    MAAR ondertussen is Amazon een van de meest kostbare bedrijven ter wereld en diens oprichter bij de top 3 rijkste mensen ter wereld

    of zoals Bredero zei: "het kan verkeren"
  18. forum rang 10 DeZwarteRidder 8 augustus 2021 16:12
    quote:

    Katsjinggg schreef op 8 augustus 2021 15:54:

    [...]even ter duiding ....Amazon was jaaaaren niet winstgevend, en kende veel dips (zelfs tot meer dan - 80%) ....nog steeds is de het deel van de firma dat toen de core was een zorgenkindje...
    MAAR ondertussen is Amazon een van de meest kostbare bedrijven ter wereld en diens oprichter bij de top 3 rijkste mensen ter wereld
    of zoals Bredero zei: "het kan verkeren"
    Amazon heeft met z'n pakjes bijna nooit iets verdiend, maar bij toeval is Amazon toch nog wat waard geworden doordat ze als bijzaak cloudservice gingen verlenen.

    En deze bijzaak is hoofdzaak geworden en levert nu verreweg het grootste gedeelte van de winst op.
  20. Belegopjeboterham 9 augustus 2021 18:22
    quote:

    suske wiet schreef op 9 augustus 2021 17:55:

    rare beweging .
    Vrijdag voor beurs opening plus 10 % slot min 0,38 dollar .
    Vandaag bijna 10 omhoog .
    Zijn er beter analisten rapporten gekomen ?
    https://www.cnbc.com/video/2021/08/09/plug-power-ceo-andrew-marsh-on-earnings-outlook-and-infrastructure.html
4.626 Posts
Pagina: «« 1 ... 144 145 146 147 148 ... 232 »» | Laatste |Omhoog ↑

Meedoen aan de discussie?

Word nu gratis lid of log in met je emailadres en wachtwoord.

Direct naar Forum

Premium

Een nieuwe kapitaalronde lijkt onvermijdelijk voor Plug Power

Het laatste advies leest u als abonnee van IEX Premium

Inloggen Word Abonnee

Plug Power Nieuws

  1. Plug Power gaat samenwerken met Atlas Copco
  2. OCI plaatst order bij Plug Power
  3. Plug Power neemt Applied Cryo Technologies definitief over
  4. Plug Power en Airbus gaan samenwerken
  5. Plug Power investeert in grote groene waterstoffabriek
  6. Sterke resultaten Plug Power