Ontvang nu dagelijks onze kooptips!

word abonnee
Van beleggers
voor beleggers
Uitgebreid zoeken

Beurscodes, betekenis en hulp bij zoeken

Europa

AEX
Euronext Amsterdam
BRU
Euronext Brussels
PSE
Euronext Paris
LIS
Euronext Lissabon
CHX
CBOE Europe, grote(re) EU aandelen
NAV
Investment Funds (NAV)

Noord-Amerika

NYS
New York Stock Exchange
OTC
CBOE BZX Exchange (US)
TSE
Toronto Stock Exchange

Kunt u een instrument niet vinden?

Zoek dan via de zogenaamde ISIN code. Elk instrument, aandeel etc. heeft een unieke code.

Kies vervolgens - wanneer er meerdere resultaten zijn - de notering op de beurs van uw keuze.

Waar vind ik die ISIN code?

Google de naam van het instrument, aandeel etc. met de toevoeging 'ISIN'.

Als zoeken op ISIN code geen resultaten oplevert hebben wij het instrument of aandeel niet in onze koersendatabase.

desktop iconMarkt Monitor
  • Word abonnee

  • Inloggen

    • Geen account? Registreren

    Wachtwoord vergeten?
Markt vandaag Koersen Forum Premium IEX Expert
Home  /  Forum  /  Koffiekamer  /  Richard Abma - Hindenburg-risico

Koffiekamer« Terug naar discussie overzicht

Richard Abma - Hindenburg-risico

Volgen
61 Posts
Pagina: «« 1 2 3 4 »» | Laatste | Omlaag ↓
  9. [verwijderd] 1 juni 2013 10:28
    As a result, markets sold off rapidly into the close, with the Standard & Poor's 500 down 1.43 percent and the Dow industrials tumbling more than 200 points to close off 1.36 percent.

    'Hindenburg Omen' Is Really About Volatility
    The phenomenon happens if both highs and lows are greater than 2.2 percent of the total issues that trade that day. That would translate into about 73 stocks each way.

    In Friday's trading, there were 156 new lows and 90 new highs, according to Thomson Reuters.
    Wiki
    Possible weaknesses
    Structural: New highs and lows are being affected by exchange-traded funds (ETFs). The last two times Hindenburg triggered was due to Bond ETFs making new highs or lows. If ETFs were removed, Hindenburg would not have triggered. When the Omen was originally designed there were no ETFs, so triggering behaviour in the 2010s is not the same as in the 1990s to mid-2000s.
    Theoretical: It is theoretically possible for those with unlimited financial resources and minimally regulated automated trading systems to keep the omen from triggering. This has been postulated by the creator of the "Vergulde Draeck" Omen.
    Triggering: To eliminate false positives some technical analysts have imposed the condition that the Hindenburg Omen
    - must be triggered three times in a row within a month from the first triggering event for said initial trigger signal to be considered to be valid (i.e. requires double confirmation)
    -is only valid when "all tightly coupled triggerings are within a fortnight"
    -will indicate a possible future downturn or correction, depending on the magnitude of any "one off" triggering

    Conclusions
    From historical data, the probability of a move greater than 5% to the downside after a confirmed Hindenburg Omen was 77% [The Wall Street Journal 8/23/2010 article cited below states that accuracy is 25%, looking at period from 1985], and usually takes place within the next forty days. The probability of a panic sellout was 41% and the probability of a major stock market crash was 24%. Though the Omen does not have a 100% success rate, every NYSE crash since 1985 has been preceded by a Hindenburg Omen. Of the previous 25 confirmed signals only two (8%) have failed to predict at least mild (2.0% to 4.9%) declines.
    Because of the specific and seemingly random nature of the Hindenburg Omen criteria, the phenomenon may be simply a case of overfitting. That is, by backtesting through a large data set with many different variables, correlations can be found that do not really have predictive significance. The Omen is at best an imperfect technical indicator that is a work in progress.
  20. retsok 15 augustus 2013 11:29
    While I would never dismiss a Hindenburg Omen outright, it does make more sense, I believe, to run the criteria on operating-only companies like the S&P 1500 rather than on the NYSE, which is riddled with closed-end bond funds. While we are getting Hindenburg Omens on the NYSE like we did during May, the spike in new lows is largely due to fixed-income (interest-rate sensitive) funds. ...

    When you run the criteria for the Hindenburg Omen on the S&P 1500, which is NOWHERE REMOTELY near a "sell signal",...... given its composition of companies linked to economic growth. No Bear Market on the horizon so do not anticipate any major decline as those referencing the Hindenburg Omen suggest.
61 Posts
Pagina: «« 1 2 3 4 »» | Laatste |Omhoog ↑

Meedoen aan de discussie?

Word nu gratis lid of log in met je emailadres en wachtwoord.

Direct naar Forum

Markt Vandaag

Stijgers

instrument koers absoluut verschil relatief verschil
Accsys 0,631 +0,04 +6,59%
Vastned 24,550 +0,95 +4,03%
ForFarmers 3,135 +0,11 +3,47%
EBUSCO HOLDING 0,991 +0,03 +3,12%
Sif Holding 12,300 +0,30 +2,50%
Kendrion 12,660 +0,28 +2,26%
Avantium 1,830 +0,04 +2,23%
Flow Traders 17,430 +0,30 +1,75%
Eurocommercial Properties 23,850 +0,35 +1,49%
HEIJMANS KON 24,550 +0,30 +1,24%
Basic-Fit 22,140 +0,24 +1,10%
NSI 20,150 +0,21 +1,05%
Wereldhave 14,220 +0,14 +0,99%
OCI 28,880 +0,28 +0,98%
RENEWI 7,720 +0,07 +0,92%
Corbion 23,500 +0,20 +0,86%
ACOMO 17,420 +0,14 +0,81%
NN Group 44,300 +0,27 +0,61%
WDP 24,160 +0,14 +0,58%
TKH 36,640 +0,18 +0,49%
Sligro 12,780 +0,04 +0,31%
ASCX 1.185,26 +3,54 +0,30%
JDE PEET'S 20,440 +0,04 +0,20%
UNILEVER PLC 58,860 +0,08 +0,14%
Van Lanschot Kempen NV 40,500 +0,05 +0,12%
Heineken 81,500 +0,06 +0,07%
RELX 42,180 +0,02 +0,05%
Pharming 0,682 0,00 0,00%

Dalers

instrument koers absoluut verschil relatief verschil
ASML 736,400 -46,40 -5,93%
ASMI 555,400 -33,60 -5,70%
Brunel 8,900 -0,45 -4,81%
THEON INTERNAT 10,640 -0,48 -4,32%
AZERION 1,414 -0,06 -3,81%
JUST EAT TAKEAWAY 12,625 -0,38 -2,92%
NX FILTRATION 4,870 -0,14 -2,79%
FASTNED 15,620 -0,44 -2,74%
Aegon 5,356 -0,15 -2,72%
Fugro 21,260 -0,52 -2,39%
ASR Nederland 43,390 -1,01 -2,27%
ALLFUNDS GROUP 5,205 -0,10 -1,89%
Galapagos 25,860 -0,44 -1,67%
Air France-KLM 8,084 -0,13 -1,56%
Arcadis 64,650 -1,00 -1,52%
BESI 110,800 -1,70 -1,51%
Aperam 23,800 -0,34 -1,41%
Alfen N.V. 13,220 -0,18 -1,34%
AEX 896,98 -11,87 -1,31%
UMG 23,330 -0,27 -1,14%
SHELL PLC 31,005 -0,35 -1,10%
RANDSTAD NV 42,890 -0,45 -1,04%
ArcelorMittal 20,020 -0,21 -1,04%
SBM Offshore 16,500 -0,17 -1,02%
ING 16,084 -0,16 -0,96%
ABN AMRO BANK N.V. 15,290 -0,15 -0,94%
B&S Group SA 4,620 -0,04 -0,75%
Ahold Delhaize 31,200 -0,23 -0,73%
Nedap N.V. 57,200 -0,40 -0,69%
SIGNIFY NV 21,140 -0,14 -0,66%
CM.COM 6,300 -0,04 -0,63%
CTP 16,200 -0,10 -0,61%
INPOST 16,420 -0,10 -0,61%
BAM 3,684 -0,02 -0,59%
Akzo Nobel 57,400 -0,34 -0,59%
PostNL 1,221 -0,01 -0,57%
AMX 886,08 -5,06 -0,57%
EXOR NV 99,000 -0,55 -0,55%
ADYEN NV 1.291,200 -6,60 -0,51%
Wolters Kluwer 153,500 -0,70 -0,45%
KPN 3,685 -0,02 -0,43%
Fagron 19,080 -0,08 -0,42%
AALBERTS NV 34,720 -0,14 -0,40%
Vopak 41,560 -0,14 -0,34%
TomTom 5,045 -0,01 -0,30%
Philips Koninklijke 27,010 -0,05 -0,18%
DSM FIRMENICH AG 120,150 -0,20 -0,17%
PROSUS 33,350 -0,05 -0,16%
AMG Critical Materials N.V. 14,110 -0,02 -0,14%
IMCD 151,450 -0,05 -0,03%
vlag naam koers verschil relatief verschil
AEX 896,98 -11,87 -1,31%
AEX GR 3.505,13 -45,53 -1,28%
Germany40^ 18.572,70 -174,41 -0,93%
FTSE 100 8.269,60 -28,86 -0,35%
EURO50 4.843,24 -40,07 -0,82%
US30^ 40.950,70 +15,20 +0,04%
Nasd100^ 18.919,30 -52,60 -0,28%
US500^ 5.516,96 -14,14 -0,26%
Japan225^ 36.722,30 -885,60 -2,35%
VD-NEW 17,66 +1,45 +8,97%
#/^ Index indications calculated real time, zie disclaimer