Ontvang nu dagelijks onze kooptips!

word abonnee
Van beleggers
voor beleggers
desktop iconMarkt Monitor
  • Word abonnee
  • Inloggen

    • Geen account? Registreren

    Wachtwoord vergeten?

Aandeel BAM Groep Koninklijke AEX:BAMNB.NL, NL0000337319

Laatste koers (eur) Verschil Volume
3,602   +0,024   (+0,67%) Dagrange 3,560 - 3,606 431.968   Gem. (3M) 905,7K

BAM juni 2020

1.172 Posts
Pagina: «« 1 ... 47 48 49 50 51 ... 59 »» | Laatste | Omlaag ↓
  1. forum rang 6 €d_Modus Vivendi 25 juni 2020 08:32
    en daar zijn we weer
    Cambridgeshire County Council takes legal action against BAM Nuttall over guided busway repair bill
    By Paul Brackley -
    paul.brackley@iliffemedia.co.uk
    Published: 17:36, 24 June 2020
    | Updated: 17:45, 24 June 2020

    Cambridgeshire County Council is taking legal action against BAM Nuttall over the cost to repair defects to the guided busway.

    The contractor is defending the claim.
    Guided Busway, Cambridge. Picture: Keith Heppell. (28831728)
    Guided Busway, Cambridge. Picture: Keith Heppell. (28831728)

    The development is the latest in the protracted dispute over the 16-mile (25km) busway, which runs from St Ives to Cambridge and opened after a series of delays in August 2011.

    A council spokesperson said: “We have lodged a formal claim with the court and are proceeding with legal action against BAM Nuttall.

    “The claim is for the cost to repair defects on the guided busway. This follows a thorough review and advice from external legal and technical experts, who have assessed the work and the contract.

    “BAM Nuttall are defending the claim and if this continues the claim will have to be heard by the courts and a potential trial is unlikely to be until the end of 2021 or possibly 2022.

    “It would be inappropriate to comment further while legal proceedings are active.”
    Top Stories on Cambridge Independent

    Volunteer group call for reservoir to protect River Cam as part of Let It Flow! report
    Avacta confirms Affimer reagents prevent infection of human cells in model of Covid-19 virus
    Alex Rushmer says Cambridge restaurant Vanderlyle may not reopen this year due to Covid-19 crisis
    Cambridgeshire is heading for a drought, warns Environment Agency

    A spokesperson for BAM Nuttall told the Cambridge Independent: “Since the busway opened in 2011 passenger numbers have grown 47 per cent. The busway is a fantastic piece of transport infrastructure which has performed consistently and reliably.

    “In the six years since the council’s consultants alleged that the busway would need hundreds of interventions each month, this has not come to pass. The engineering evidence shows that it will not come to pass in the future.

    “BAM has long sought to work with the council to address its concerns. We’ve assured the council, on many occasions, that anything wrong with the busway design, for which BAM Nuttall is responsible, we’ll put it right

    “It’s disappointing that the council is progressing the matter through litigation in the High Court. Our next step is to explore the details of Cambridgeshire County Council’s claim. BAM is confident that we’ll demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the court that the design of the busway is not fundamentally defective and doesn’t require the remedial works, which the council claims.”

    Disputes over the busway began long before it opened as costs spiralled and continued for years afterwards.

    Cambridgeshire County Council pursued a £60million claim against BAM Nuttall, and reached an out of court settlement with the company in August 2013, under which it paid £84.7million, slightly more than the original £83.9m fee due for the engineering works.

    Legal costs and other charges took the total cost for the busway to £152m - well above the original £116.2m estimate - with £26m paid by the council budget.

    Disputes continued, however, as cracks appeared in the concrete beams, with estimates in 2017 suggesting £36.5m of repairs were required.

  2. forum rang 6 innicksname 25 juni 2020 08:58
    quote:

    rsantego schreef op 24 juni 2020 17:57:

    Op deze bloedrode dag Post.nl o,8 % in de plus. Het is nog niet te laat om in te stappen. Bam gaat nog veel lager. Ik denk € 1,00 net als Post.nl enkele maanden terrug.
    Zolang je het denkt en niet kunt/wilt onderbouwen, dan nemen we het (hoop dat je het goed vindt) met een korreltje zout.
  3. forum rang 6 innicksname 25 juni 2020 08:59
    quote:

    Businessman schreef op 24 juni 2020 18:47:

    Oke ik plaats hier een ta the best lachen hoe het aandeel naar beneden willen praten,technisch zie ik uiterlijk,1,556 aantikken ,maar zie het zelf als een in mijn geval koopmoment.
    Maar aangezien het aandeel met weinig volumes naar beneden is gezet,schijnbaar door dat shorters het voor het zeggen hebben,verwacht ik in betere tijd n dat deze shorters moeten terug draaien en het aandeel met aardige percentage,s omhoog gaat,de komende dagen annex weken al ,succes
    Je maakt maar één punt.
1.172 Posts
Pagina: «« 1 ... 47 48 49 50 51 ... 59 »» | Laatste |Omhoog ↑

Meedoen aan de discussie?

Word nu gratis lid of log in met je emailadres en wachtwoord.