Ontvang nu dagelijks onze kooptips!

word abonnee
Van beleggers
voor beleggers
desktop iconMarkt Monitor
  • Word abonnee
  • Inloggen

    • Geen account? Registreren

    Wachtwoord vergeten?

BioPharma« Terug naar discussie overzicht

Insmed, in de gaten houden

20.047 Posts
Pagina: «« 1 ... 842 843 844 845 846 ... 1003 »» | Laatste | Omlaag ↓
  1. [verwijderd] 12 juni 2006 21:13
    Monday , June 12, 2006 14:54 ET

    Tercica, Inc. (TRCA) filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond division alleging Insmed Incorporated (INSM) violated the Lanham Act and related statutes relating to false advertising and unfair competition. This action was taken after the presiding Judge for the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, dismissed on June 9, 2006 Tercica’s complaint for the same violations on the basis that she could not exercise jurisdiction over Insmed, which is based in Virginia. Her ruling also indicated that the complaint should establish that the requisite false statements were disseminated to consumers of Increlex™, e.g., the physicians who purchase and prescribe Increlex, rather than solely to investors. Tercica’s re-filing adds new allegations of false and misleading advertising that Insmed disseminated specifically to pediatric endocrinologists.

  2. [verwijderd] 12 juni 2006 21:19
    quote:

    DieGroeneGigant schreef:

    Monday , June 12, 2006 14:54 ET

    Tercica, Inc. (TRCA) filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond division alleging Insmed Incorporated (INSM) violated the Lanham Act and related statutes relating to false advertising and unfair competition. This action was taken after the presiding Judge for the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, dismissed on June 9, 2006 Tercica’s complaint for the same violations on the basis that she could not exercise jurisdiction over Insmed, which is based in Virginia. Her ruling also indicated that the complaint should establish that the requisite false statements were disseminated to consumers of Increlex™, e.g., the physicians who purchase and prescribe Increlex, rather than solely to investors. Tercica’s re-filing adds new allegations of false and misleading advertising that Insmed disseminated specifically to pediatric endocrinologists.


    hehreh... bij verkeerde loket gefiled..daarom dismissed en nu opnieuw ingediend...

    homestate van insm nu... heheheheheh
  3. [verwijderd] 12 juni 2006 22:06
    quote:

    crackedtooth schreef:

    [quote=DieGroeneGigant]
    Monday , June 12, 2006 14:54 ET

    Tercica, Inc. (TRCA) filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond division alleging Insmed Incorporated (INSM) violated the Lanham Act and related statutes relating to false advertising and unfair competition. This action was taken after the presiding Judge for the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, dismissed on June 9, 2006 Tercica’s complaint for the same violations on the basis that she could not exercise jurisdiction over Insmed, which is based in Virginia. Her ruling also indicated that the complaint should establish that the requisite false statements were disseminated to consumers of Increlex™, e.g., the physicians who purchase and prescribe Increlex, rather than solely to investors. Tercica’s re-filing adds new allegations of false and misleading advertising that Insmed disseminated specifically to pediatric endocrinologists.


    [/quote]

    hehreh... bij verkeerde loket gefiled..daarom dismissed en nu opnieuw ingediend...

    homestate van insm nu... heheheheheh
    Vertragings tactiek.. Geen enkele, zelfs geen amerikaanse, advocaat is zo dom om een proces te willen starten bij het verkeerde gerecht.. achterlijke vertoning.
20.047 Posts
Pagina: «« 1 ... 842 843 844 845 846 ... 1003 »» | Laatste |Omhoog ↑