Ontvang nu dagelijks onze kooptips!

word abonnee
Van beleggers
voor beleggers
desktop iconMarkt Monitor

BioPharma« Terug naar discussie overzicht

GTCB - GTC Biotherapeutics - Deel 3

1.039 Posts
Pagina: «« 1 ... 42 43 44 45 46 ... 52 »» | Laatste | Omlaag ↓
  1. [verwijderd] 12 september 2006 22:08
    Binck slot

    Laatste 1,21
    Laatste volume 100
    Tijd 19:38
    +/- -0,02 -1,63%
    Volume 187.723

    Bied 00:00
    Biedvolume
    Laat 00:00
    Laatvolume

    Slot 1,23 11/9
    Open 1,24 15:29
    Hoog 1,24 15:29
    Laag 1,18 17:24

    EN BEDANKT VOOR DE SERVICE !
    b.k.
    (AL TWEE DAGEN ONTEVREDEN!)
    over binck dan welteverstaan.

    volgens ticklist
    21:53:13 1,1900 100
    21:53:10 1,1900 100
    21:52:52 1,2000 200
    21:48:55 1,1900 100
    21:48:55 1,1892 100
    21:48:55 1,1900 100
    21:48:55 1,1900 100
    21:48:55 1,1900 200

    is nog nets iets sneller dan bick
  2. [verwijderd] 13 september 2006 06:29
    Re GTCB

    Despite pleas from various persons on this board to try to concentrate on the science and strategy, we can't seem to stay away from the subject of why the pps is so meager. Personally I prefer the science, but feel compelled after reading the litany of these posts to add my two cents.

    Please include IMHO before all my comments.

    The idea the stock is being "manipulated", is well, pardon me, preposterous. This stock has been trading less than 500,000 shares/day, with an average movement of 2cents. That means the total delta/day is less than 10,000$, chump change by street standards, eg the equivalent of 10,000 shares of a 50$ stock going up or down a dollar. You figure out which one takes more effort. What the tape says about GTCB is the volume is low, and the price is drifting down. The diagnosis is no interest on the buy side. Since the science and the prospects are good,

    Why no buyers?? Several reasons first off the share price of less than 1.50$ is simply below the radar screen, undetectable.I was flabergasted to hear Soros owned this stock, but very excited he thought enough of the idea to dip this low.
    GTCB is only slight above Lucifer on Wall Street's list of fallen angels. There are plenty of fund managers who remember when Transgenics was selling for 50$/share in 2000 awaiting FDA approval for Atryn when the company abruptly aborted the trials causing the stock fall faster than Challenger. To the ones who saw guys lose their jobs as well as their money, this stock is purple Koolaid. Some also (I don't agree) feel the company screwed up the EMEA trials and was later given a free pass.

    What will make the stock go up?? News drives small biotechs. A deal with a big pharma would be big (Bristol Myers can you hear me??) A sustaining revinue from a product would be huge and convey to all the worth of the company.

    Until then.......be patient.
    thomson.finance.lycos.com/lycos/iwatc...
  3. [verwijderd] 13 september 2006 07:15
    quote:

    DieGroeneGigant schreef:

    "groen ventje" ?

    GroeneGIGANT !

    RT ? Is ie al op 1.02 ? Dat is eerste stop. Dan technisch herstel en dan dippie naar 0.88 usd. En als het even meezit met emmissies dan zien we toch nog de 0.75 usd. Lekker laag !

    Inmiddels wel 14% gezakt vanaf laatste top.

    print.chartnet.nl/Show.cgi?Img=FF298E...
    Waar is die " Gap '" Gigant???
    B.K.
    Beurskabouter.
  4. [verwijderd] 13 september 2006 08:22
    quote:

    Beurs-kneus schreef:

    [quote=DieGroeneGigant]
    "groen ventje" ?

    GroeneGIGANT !

    RT ? Is ie al op 1.02 ? Dat is eerste stop. Dan technisch herstel en dan dippie naar 0.88 usd. En als het even meezit met emmissies dan zien we toch nog de 0.75 usd. Lekker laag !

    Inmiddels wel 14% gezakt vanaf laatste top.

    print.chartnet.nl/Show.cgi?Img=FF298E...
    [/quote]

    Waar is die " Gap '" Gigant???
    B.K.
    Beurskabouter.
    Wat willen jullie hiermee bereiken? Houd het s.v.p. zakelijk of open voor jullie zelf een afzonderlijk draadje waar jullie je "vete" afzonderlijk uitvechten.
  5. ludwig mack 13 september 2006 11:12
    quote:

    SkySpam1 schreef:

    Re GTCB

    Despite pleas from various persons on this board to try to concentrate on the science and strategy, we can't seem to stay away from the subject of why the pps is so meager. Personally I prefer the science, but feel compelled after reading the litany of these posts to add my two cents.

    Please include IMHO before all my comments.

    The idea the stock is being "manipulated", is well, pardon me, preposterous. This stock has been trading less than 500,000 shares/day, with an average movement of 2cents. That means the total delta/day is less than 10,000$, chump change by street standards, eg the equivalent of 10,000 shares of a 50$ stock going up or down a dollar. You figure out which one takes more effort. What the tape says about GTCB is the volume is low, and the price is drifting down. The diagnosis is no interest on the buy side. Since the science and the prospects are good,

    Why no buyers?? Several reasons first off the share price of less than 1.50$ is simply below the radar screen, undetectable.I was flabergasted to hear Soros owned this stock, but very excited he thought enough of the idea to dip this low.
    GTCB is only slight above Lucifer on Wall Street's list of fallen angels. There are plenty of fund managers who remember when Transgenics was selling for 50$/share in 2000 awaiting FDA approval for Atryn when the company abruptly aborted the trials causing the stock fall faster than Challenger. To the ones who saw guys lose their jobs as well as their money, this stock is purple Koolaid. Some also (I don't agree) feel the company screwed up the EMEA trials and was later given a free pass.

    What will make the stock go up?? News drives small biotechs. A deal with a big pharma would be big (Bristol Myers can you hear me??) A sustaining revinue from a product would be huge and convey to all the worth of the company.

    Until then.......be patient.
    thomson.finance.lycos.com/lycos/iwatc...

    leuk betoog met leuke beeldspraak, maar in het begin van betoog een denkfout: de reden achter de lage koers is volgens mij overname of gewoon opbouwen van een belang. dat er niet veel kopers zijn ligt ook ook de lage koers die kunstmatig is en alleen bij goedkeuring de enorme vraag op dat moment niet kon tegen gehouden. veder is omzet in aantallen niet echt laag te noemen; m.a.w. er komt toch heel wat los per dag dat ze gestaag binnenharken.
    ben benieuwd !
1.039 Posts
Pagina: «« 1 ... 42 43 44 45 46 ... 52 »» | Laatste |Omhoog ↑